Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:16

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Rainbow Six Siege X Review in Progress - IGN
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump puts U.S. Steel cart before the horse - Axios
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Is the 4B movement's aggressiveness against men for seeing women as mantelpieces valid?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
The two rules investors need to follow right now as the S&P 500 eyes a return to 6,000 - MarketWatch
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Which K-pop idol has a good fashion sense in your opinion?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Health officials warn of measles case from traveler at Dulles Airport - The Washington Post
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What movies and TV shows portray realistic beauty standards?